Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2011-04-07 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2011-04-07 House Journal Page 0808 HB 168 The following was read the second time: 2011-04-07 House Journal Page 0809 HOUSE BILL NO. 168 "An Act requiring the amount of the security given by a party seeking an injunction or order vacating or staying the operation of a permit affecting an industrial operation to include an amount for the payment of wages and benefits for employees and payments to contractors and subcontractors that may be lost if the industrial operation is wrongfully enjoined." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT CS(JUD) 3DP 2NR 751 FN1: ZERO(DEC) 751 FN2: ZERO(DFG) 751 FN3: ZERO(LAW) 751 FN4: ZERO(DNR) 751 Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 168(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 168(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 168(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 168(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 168(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 33 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2011-04-07 House Journal Page 0810 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Cissna, Costello, Dick, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gatto, Gruenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Olson, Petersen, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Nays: Doogan, Gara, Gardner, Guttenberg, Kerttula, Miller Excused: Neuman And so, CSHB 168(JUD) passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.